Publication Ethics

The Publication Ethics of Scholarly Insight Review are designed to ensure that the journal maintains the highest standards of ethical conduct in all aspects of the publishing process. This includes transparency, accountability, and integrity in the treatment of authors, reviewers, editors, and readers. The following guidelines outline the ethical principles that guide the journal's operations:

1. Ethical Guidelines for Authors

Authors are expected to adhere to the highest standards of ethics in their research, writing, and publication. The ethical responsibilities of authors include:

• Originality and Plagiarism: Authors must submit original work and avoid plagiarism. Proper acknowledgment of sources is required for any ideas, text, data, or results that are not their own.
• Data Accuracy: Authors must ensure that the data presented in their manuscripts are accurate and reflect the true results of the research conducted. Any errors or inaccuracies discovered after submission should be reported promptly to the editorial team.
• Authorship: Only those who have made substantial contributions to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the research should be listed as authors. All contributors must be accurately credited, and the corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have approved the final version of the manuscript.
• Conflicts of Interest: Authors must disclose any potential conflicts of interest that may have influenced their research, such as financial or personal relationships with organizations or individuals related to the study. This includes funding sources or any other circumstances that may bias the research.
• Redundant Publication: Authors should not submit the same manuscript to multiple journals simultaneously. Previously published work or content submitted elsewhere must be properly cited or disclosed.
• Human and Animal Rights: If applicable, authors must ensure that their research adheres to ethical standards for the use of human or animal subjects. Ethics approval from relevant authorities should be obtained and stated in the manuscript.

2. Ethical Guidelines for Reviewers

Reviewers play a crucial role in maintaining the quality and integrity of the journal. The ethical responsibilities of reviewers include:

• Confidentiality: Reviewers must treat manuscripts as confidential documents. They should not share, discuss, or use the content of the manuscript for their personal or professional advantage before publication.
• Objectivity: Reviews should be conducted objectively, based on the merits of the manuscript. Personal bias or conflicts of interest should not influence the review process.
• Constructive Feedback: Reviewers should provide clear, constructive, and timely feedback to authors, helping to improve the quality of the manuscript. They should identify any flaws or weaknesses in the research, methodology, or writing in a respectful and professional manner.
• Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest: Reviewers must disclose any conflicts of interest, such as personal, professional, or financial relationships with the author(s) that could influence their judgment during the review process.
• Detection of Plagiarism: Reviewers should report any suspected instances of plagiarism, redundant publication, or other ethical violations to the editorial team.

3. Ethical Guidelines for Editors

Editors are responsible for ensuring that the journal operates in a fair, transparent, and ethical manner. The ethical responsibilities of editors include:

• Fairness and Objectivity: Editors must evaluate manuscripts based on their scientific merit, originality, and relevance to the journal’s scope, without regard to the authors' identities, affiliations, or personal biases.
• Confidentiality: Editors must treat all manuscripts as confidential. They should not disclose information about a manuscript to anyone other than the authors, reviewers, and relevant editorial staff.
• Accountability: Editors are responsible for ensuring that the peer review process is conducted fairly and that the decisions made regarding publication are based on sound academic judgment.
• Handling Conflicts of Interest: Editors must disclose and manage any conflicts of interest. If an editor has a conflict of interest with a manuscript under consideration, they should recuse themselves from the decision-making process and assign the manuscript to another editor.
• Corrections and Retractions: If errors, misconduct, or unethical practices are discovered after publication, editors are responsible for ensuring that appropriate corrective action is taken. This may include issuing corrections, retractions, or clarifications, depending on the nature of the issue.
• Transparency in Editorial Decisions: Editors must provide authors with clear explanations of decisions regarding manuscript acceptance, revision, or rejection. Authors should have access to the reviewers' comments, except in cases where confidentiality needs to be maintained.

4. Ethical Guidelines for the Journal

The journal itself adheres to the highest ethical standards in all aspects of publication. These guidelines include:

• Transparency: The journal ensures that all aspects of its publication process, including peer review, editorial decisions, and funding sources, are transparent to authors, reviewers, and readers.
• Independence: The editorial decision-making process is independent of external influences, including commercial, political, or personal interests.
• Plagiarism Prevention: The journal uses plagiarism detection tools to ensure that submitted manuscripts are original and do not contain plagiarized material. Any instances of plagiarism are addressed promptly, following the journal’s plagiarism policy.
• Copyright and Licensing: The journal adheres to copyright laws and ensures that authors retain copyright over their work while providing open access under appropriate licensing terms (e.g., Creative Commons licenses) to allow for wider dissemination.
• Funding and Conflicts of Interest: The journal requires authors to disclose the sources of funding for their research and any potential conflicts of interest that may affect their work.

5. Handling Misconduct

Scholarly Insight Review takes allegations of research misconduct seriously, including plagiarism, data falsification, and unethical authorship practices. The journal adheres to the guidelines provided by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and follows its recommendations in dealing with cases of misconduct. The steps for handling misconduct include:

• Investigation: Allegations of misconduct are investigated thoroughly by the editorial team, with input from relevant experts or institutions if necessary.
• Corrective Action: If misconduct is confirmed, appropriate corrective actions will be taken, such as retraction of the article, correction of the record, or reporting to the author’s institution or funding body.
• Transparency: In cases of misconduct, the journal will issue retraction notices or corrections to the article in question, and the reasons for the actions will be clearly stated.

6. Adherence to Ethical Guidelines

Scholarly Insight Review adheres to the ethical guidelines set forth by international organizations such as:

• COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics)
• ICMJE (International Committee of Medical Journal Editors)
• WAME (World Association of Medical Editors)
• Elsevier's Publication Ethics Guidelines

The Publication Ethics of Scholarly Insight Review are designed to foster a fair, transparent, and ethical publishing environment. By adhering to these guidelines, the journal ensures the integrity of the research it publishes, maintaining trust and credibility within the academic community.